AMERIQUE:


A NOTE FROM THE EDITOR: It is the unspoken statistic, but it is as real as anything to do with the lingering U.S. war efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan. According to the military, 1,800 American servicemen have killed themselves since the initial invasion of Baghdad. That is in addition to the more than 4,000 who died in battle. This week, families of the soldiers who committed suicide asked President Barack Obama to change the government policy of not forwarding letters of appreciation to mothers and fathers of these servicemen. By week's end, the White House had reversed the policy and agreed that such letters are needed, as well... - Eduardo Paz-Martinez, Editor of The Tribune

Tuesday, April 20, 2010

In Mexico, A Pathetic Admission That All Is Lost In War Against Drugs...


By RON MEXICO
Staff Writer

BROWNSVILLE, TX - In the three and a half years since Mexican President Felipe Calderon launched the army against the drug cartels in an unprecedented offensive, what Mexico has seen is a bloody war that has failed and has left more than 22,000 citizens dead, some 6,000 along the U.S. Border.

Now, as he prepares to meet with President Obama in Washington, D.C. next month, the betting here is that he will acknowledge defeat and ask for U.S. Military intervention. Perhaps he will seek asylum, goes the joke in the Mexican capital, where he is now written about as a drunkard and a willing accomplice to at least one drug cartel.

The U.S., meanwhile, has been poring through a depressing report presented to Congress by a fact-finding team working for the foreign intelligence committee. In it, investigators will say Mexico has been woeful in its approach to curtailing the flow of drugs and in controlling the warring drug cartels. The report will highlight the Mexican bordertown of Cd. Juarez, where even locals now call it Murder City, the world's number one city in that unflattering regard.

"What has happened during the length of these three and a half years in the combat zones, beyond the executions, the gunfights, the grenade-launchings, the taking of hostages, the deaths of citizens, the many, many government declarations that, more and more, mean less and less?" the respected Mexico City PROCESO magazine posed recently.

Felipe Calderon's war has not gone well. Critics within the country say it has no end under the current approach. In a mind-numbing style, Calderon has taken to ordering the much-criticized Mexican Army into and out of cities in towns where the battles rage, retreat, and then return. The result is an aftermath of wanton killings, unexplained tactics and an emboldend opposition.

In Reynosa less than 60 miles west of here and other towns, the cartels have been brave enough to hang banners from bridges and overpasses declaring their intent, day and time of their battles, and, in fact, even asking the public to stay home during these military incursions. The banners are signed so that there is no mistaking its author.

Protesters, in turn, carry and hang their own signs and posters. "To live better, resign Calderon," read one in Juarez. Another read, "No war in my name." Another: "Mr. Calderon, you want to end the delincuency...first end the corruption in your Cabinet." The worst: "Mr. Narco-President, if you want to end the insecurity, stop protecting the narcotraffickers like El Chapo Guzman, Ismael 'El Maya' Sambada, the Michoacan Family, and the partisan government officials, who like yourself, are Narcos like the ones before you."

In its wake, the mess in Mexico leaves a young population so traumatized as to lead the country's own psychologists to say Mexico has now ruined its present and its future. An incident at Monterrey Tech that saw two students gunned down on campus is now as famous in Mexico as the shootings at Kent State in this country during the Vietnam War protests. The only difference is that there was no protest at Monterrey Tech.

And so it goes in bloodied Mexico...
- 30 -       

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

I'm not sure if any of the journalists on this blog noticed the First Lady being interviewed while in Mexico recently. Some reporter asked her what she thought of the drug war being waged currently in Mexico and what she thought of the safety of travelling in Mexico. Her response was that she thought it was very safe, if you pay attention to what you are doing. Guess that is the formal response from the White House as well.

Jacinto

Don Pancho said...

Don Patricio, friend an compadre, if people here in the U.S. would quit smoking dope and stop using all the other stuff they use,(drugs).
And if all the weapons going to Mexico from the good old usa would stop also. Mexico wouldn't be imploding. I feel for the paisanos. But untill the use and demand stops. The bloody war will continue.
Have a very good pleasant day. The politics in Harlingen is really heating up.
Have a lot of work to do still.

Patrick Alcatraz said...

Jacinto, Don Pancho: Good points. The First Lady's travel arrangements are superior to that which regular citizens can afford. Her view of Mexico comes from that perspective. (2.) As for the consumption of drugs in the USA, well, that is true. But the problem here is the killing of innocent civilians in the crossfire now seen in Mexico. Those people have no participation in the selling or consuming equation. That is the crime, the shame... - Editor

Anonymous said...

I know that you are a lifelong, dedicated journalist. Without touching your personal politics, I wonder if you see something going on that is not being reported, that I believe, is symptimatic with journalism today.

Please recall that when the Enron scandal broke, the newspapers were filled with vivacious reports of the conections between the Bush administration and Enron. All true and all rightfully pursued.

Today, the Goldman-Sachs (GS) scandal is breaking wide open. The Obama administration has deep and long ties to GS. Multiple emmbers of the White House team have been employed with or lobbied for GS over the years. GS donated over one millions dollars in campaign contributions to Obama's presidential campaign.

Today it was announced the GS will be represented by former Obama Chief Counsel Greg Craig. That's correct. The personal legal advisor to the president is now representing GS. The man was in the employ of Obama as of 4 months ago.

You want to know the subsequent Obama headlines on CNN? "Ticker: Obama sends special b-day note. The New York Times buried the story on page B11. The LA Times? They coached this headline " Greg Craig, dumped by Obama White House in November, resurfaces to side with Goldman Sachs in the blog on Washington. It didn't make print.

So you tell me, can you see the problem with journalism today?